Acts 24–26
Common Theme
Paul repeatedly bears witness to the gospel before governors and kings, showing that the message of Christ advances even through unjust trials and political delay. God sovereignly uses human courts to place His truth before powerful rulers who would not otherwise hear it.
Questions
- What stands out about how Paul frames his defense and testimony before Felix, Festus, and Agrippa?
- How do the varied responses of these leaders reveal different reactions to the same truth?
God Shot
God is sovereign over human authority and uses earthly power structures to accomplish His redemptive purposes. He persistently brings truth to light, ensuring that His gospel is proclaimed to all levels of society, from prisoners to kings.
Deeper
Acts 24
After five days, High Priest Ananias and others presented their case against Paul to Governor Felix, with Tertullus accusing Paul of being a troublemaker and a leader of the Nazarenes. Paul defended himself, stating he had not caused any disturbances in Jerusalem and that the accusations were unfounded. He acknowledged his faith in God and the resurrection, asserting his actions were in line with Jewish beliefs. Felix, familiar with the Way, postponed the decision until the arrival of Lysias, allowing Paul some freedom while in custody. Later, Felix and his wife Drusilla listened to Paul discuss faith in Christ, but Felix, feeling alarmed, dismissed him, hoping for a bribe. After two years, Felix left Paul imprisoned to appease the Jews, being succeeded by Porcius Festus.
Acts 25
After Festus arrived in the province, the chief priests and Jewish leaders sought to have Paul transferred to Jerusalem, intending to ambush and kill him. Festus refused, stating that Paul was in Caesarea and would be tried there. When Paul was brought before Festus, he defended himself against the unproven charges, asserting he had committed no offense against Jewish law, the temple, or Caesar. Festus, wanting to appease the Jews, offered to send Paul to Jerusalem for trial, but Paul insisted on being tried before Caesar, appealing to his rights as a Roman citizen. Festus agreed to this appeal. Later, King Agrippa and Bernice visited Festus, who presented Paul’s case, explaining that the accusations were religious disputes rather than criminal charges. Agrippa expressed interest in hearing Paul, and Festus noted he had no clear charges to present to the emperor, prompting the need for Agrippa’s examination of Paul to provide a basis for his report.
Acts 26
In his defense before King Agrippa, Paul expresses gratitude for the opportunity to speak, emphasizing his familiarity with Jewish customs and controversies. He recounts his life as a Pharisee and his hope in God’s promise, which is the basis for the accusations against him. Paul reflects on his past, detailing his zealous persecution of Christians, including imprisoning and voting for their execution. He describes a transformative experience on the road to Damascus, where he encountered a divine light and heard Jesus’ voice, calling him to be a servant and witness. Paul explains his mission to open the eyes of both Jews and Gentiles, urging repentance and faith in God. Despite his testimony, Festus accuses Paul of madness due to his extensive learning. Paul insists he speaks rationally and directly addresses Agrippa, questioning his belief in the prophets. Agrippa responds, suggesting Paul is trying to persuade him to become a Christian. Paul expresses his desire for all listeners to share his faith, except for his chains. After the hearing, Agrippa and others conclude that Paul has done nothing deserving of death or imprisonment, noting he could have been released if he hadn’t appealed to Caesar.