2 Kings 24–25; 2 Chronicles 36

Common Theme

The fall of Judah to Babylon demonstrates the culmination of God’s judgment against persistent rebellion and unfaithfulness. Despite repeated warnings through prophets, the people hardened their hearts, and God handed them over to exile, fulfilling His word.

Questions

• What does the fall of Jerusalem reveal about the seriousness of ignoring God’s warnings?
• How does God’s faithfulness in judgment also point to His faithfulness in keeping promises of restoration?

God Shot

God is shown as the sovereign Judge who faithfully carries out His word, even when it means bringing devastating judgment. His holiness cannot tolerate sin, and His justice ensures that rebellion is never ignored, yet even in wrath His larger purposes of redemption are still unfolding.

---

Deeper^✝

2 Kings 24-25

In 2 Kings 23:31–24:17, Jehoahaz, son of Josiah, is appointed king of Judah but is soon imprisoned by Pharaoh Necho, who makes Judah a vassal of Egypt. Jehoahaz dies in captivity without a regnal summary. Necho then installs Eliakim as king. During Jehoiakim’s reign, Babylonian power rises, leading to a struggle between Egypt and Babylon. Jehoiakim, initially supported by Egypt, rebels against Babylon. Nebuchadnezzar eventually captures Jerusalem, and Jehoiakim dies before the city surrenders. His son, Jehoiachin, reigns briefly before surrendering and facing exile. Nebuchadnezzar empties the temple and palace treasures and installs Zedekiah, Josiah’s youngest son, as a vassal king. The narrative reflects the Israelites’ faith amid suffering and alienation, paralleling the struggles of German colonists in Ukraine during the Russian Revolution, highlighting the resilience of faith in times of upheaval.
2 Kings 24:18–25:30

In 2 Kings 24:18–25:30, Zedekiah’s reign begins as a vassal of Nebuchadnezzar after Jehoiachin’s capture. Zedekiah’s rebellion against Babylon, prompted by unclear motivations, leads to Jerusalem’s siege in 588 BC, lasting about a year and a half. The city is ultimately captured, resulting in its complete destruction, including the burning of the temple and the removal of sacred vessels. Following this, Gedaliah is appointed governor by the Babylonians, but he is soon murdered by Ishmael, leading to the flight of the remaining Judahites to Egypt, marking the end of national existence.

Jehoiachin is released from prison by Awel-Marduk, Nebuchadnezzar’s successor, after two years, receiving a favored status among captive kings, although the specifics of his privileges remain unclear. The text reflects on the nature of loss, comparing physical death to the death of relationships and communities, emphasizing that while exiles lost possessions and friends, they retained hope in God’s faithfulness. This hope serves as a reminder of continuity with the past despite the pain of separation and loss.

2 Chronicles 36

2 Chronicles 36:2–21 summarizes the reigns of the last kings of Judah—Jehoahaz, Jehoiakim, Jehoiachin, and Zedekiah—highlighting the kingdom’s decline. The text emphasizes the themes of exile and the plundering of the Lord’s temple, attributing Judah’s downfall to the unfaithfulness of its leaders and people. Unlike 2 Kings, which blames Manasseh for the exile, the Chronicler holds the entire nation accountable, reflecting a corporate understanding of sin and responsibility. The Chronicler warns his contemporaries against repeating past mistakes, linking the desecration of the temple to divine judgment. The narrative underscores the retribution principle of the Mosaic covenant, where obedience leads to blessings and disobedience to curses. The Chronicler asserts that the exile was God’s doing, fulfilling prophetic words, and emphasizes God’s faithfulness to His promises. The application section draws parallels to modern discussions of theodicy, noting that while suffering persists, believers can find strength in God’s support through trials. Ultimately, the text reassures that God uses suffering to develop virtues in the faithful, leading to ultimate reward.

2 Chronicles 36:22-23 serves as a hopeful conclusion to the Chronicler’s history, directing readers to the repatriation story in Ezra-Nehemiah. The epilogue, attributed to the Chronicler, includes a date referencing the first year of Cyrus king of Persia (538 BC) and highlights Cyrus’s decree, which, while not explicitly mentioning the Hebrews, pertains to the Israelites exiled by Assyrians and Babylonians. The Chronicler emphasizes God’s sovereignty, as seen in Cyrus’s actions, which fulfill Isaiah’s prophecies regarding the restoration of Jerusalem. Cyrus is portrayed as both a shepherd and a prophet of Yahweh, facilitating the return of Jews to Palestine and the rebuilding of the temple. The text reflects on the tension between God’s sovereignty and the ongoing struggles against nations opposing Him. The incomplete citation from Ezra 1:3 in the epilogue invites worship, paralleling the psalmist’s call to ascend to the temple. This worship is essential for understanding life’s complexities, as it allows believers to gain perspective on righteousness and wickedness, echoing Peter’s affirmation of believers as a chosen people called to declare God’s praises.

^✝Deeper excerpt from NIV Application Commentary, One-Volume Edition.